Initials are used for minors was a 14-year-old high school student. Was found delinquent and sentenced to probation for one year.
In its decision in this case the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed three distinct questions.
New jersey v tlo case. 2 on the facts of this case did the school official violate that standard. The Background of New Jersey v. This case is restored to the calendar for reargument.
On appeal the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate. Supreme Court of the United States. However the school had reasonable suspicion because the two girls were smoking in the bathroom.
This case explores the legal concept of search and seizure. The acronym TLO was given to her as a result of her status as a minor. One girl admitted to smoking in response to the Assistant Vice Principals questioning.
Supreme Court ruled in New Jersey v. A New Jersey high school student was accused of violating school rules by smoking in the restroom leading an assistant principal to search her purse for cigarettes. In this case it did not occur in that way and the issue of whether the juvenile herself consented to the search by the principal under New Jersey law was decided against the state because it was not shown that she was aware she had a right to refuse which would be the test under New Jersey state law for a consent search.
New Jersey V Tlo - The Background of New Jersey v. On January 15 1985 the US. A correct understanding of the New Jersey courts standard explains why that court concluded in TLOs case that the assistant principal did not have reasonable grounds to believe that the student was concealing in her purse evidence of criminal activity or evidence of activity that would seriously interfere with school discipline or order27 The importance of the nature of the rule infraction to the New Jersey Supreme Courts.
The Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of New Jersey Middlesex County found her guilty and sentenced her to probation for one year. Two girls in Piscataway High School in New Jersey were smoking in the girls restroom. And we are looking at another Supreme Court case dealing with our right to privacy.
TLO holding that public school administrators can search a students belongings if they have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. NEW JERSEY petitioner v. Moved to suppress evidence discovered in the search but the Court denied her motion.
She was accused of. TLO 1985 In 1984 in the Piscataway Township High School in New Jersey a female student who was classified as a minor at the time of her arrest was convicted of possessing illegal paraphernalia utilized for the consumption of Marijuana. New Jersey v.
And 3 whether the exclusionary rule bars the use in a criminal proceeding of. The majority opinion delivered by Justice White stated that the schools search was reasonable and decided that in a school setting no warrant or probable cause is necessary because privacy expectations are lower when at school. TLO is the respondent in this case.
The acronym TLO was given to her as a result of her status as a minor. 1214 1984 468 US. In conclusion the court ruled in favor of TLO with a 6-3 vote in 1985.
Additionally what happened to TLO after the case. They were caught by a teacher who took the girls to the Assistant Vice Principal. First I have to ask you about the name of this case.
Statement of the Facts. The vice principal discovered marijuana and other items that implicated the student in dealing marijuana which was illegal. 1 what is the proper standard for judging the reasonableness of a school officials search of a students purse.
Is a case about whether it is constitutional for a schools staff to search a students belongings without a warrant after she was caught smoking. Today The case that defines your Fourth Amendment protections as a student New Jersey v TLO 1985. Was charged with possession of marijuana.
Because the search resulting in the discovery of the evidence of marijuana dealing by the second student was reasonable the New Jersey Supreme Courts decision to exclude that. But TLO still remained dissatisfied and appealed the case one last time to the United States Supreme Court. TLO 1985In 1984 in the Piscataway Township High School in New Jersey a female student who was classified as a minor at the time of her arrest was convicted of possessing illegal paraphernalia utilized for the consumption of Marijuana.
New Jersey v. TLO appealed the case to the appellate division which produced the same ruling as the juvenile court.
